Leadership Communication in Organizations
C&J
443; Fall 2008
Phone: (TBA, I’ll give this to students the first day of class)
Office: C&J 221
Office hours: By appointment AND Wednesday 5:30 – 6:30, Thursday 2:00 –
3:30
Email: plutgen@unm.edu or through WebCT course site
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this course is to encourage you to
think about leadership in new ways. An overarching goal of the course is to
provide students with an overview of traditional and emerging perspectives of
leadership communication in organizations. Additional goals are to (a) awaken
and develop students’ ethical character in relation to leadership, (b) test and
expand students’ emotional intelligence as it applies to building leadership
skills, and (c) help students understand the emergent nature of leadership so
that they might extend their opportunities to be viewed by others as
“leadership material.” Students will
acquire and apply this information through in-class experiential
activities, service learning, case studies, and a number of other approaches. It is my highest wish that students learn more about
themselves, particularly in interaction with others, in order to assist them in
building their own ethical, emotionally intelligent leadership skills.
Text: The course has no formal textbook. Readings
include selected research articles, websites, and book chapters. I will post
readings or links on the course’s WebCT companion site.
97.6-100 |
A+ |
92.6-97.5 |
A |
89.6-92.5 |
A- |
87.6-89.5 |
B+ |
82.6-87.5 |
B |
79.6-82.5 |
B- |
77.6-79.5 |
C+ |
72.6-77.5 |
C |
69.6-72.5 |
C- |
59.9-69.5 |
D |
< 59.9 |
F |
|
|
Grade Posting: Grades will be posted on the WebCT course supplemental
site as soon as possible after assignment grading.
COURSE FORMAT:
Learning Teams: Each student will be placed in a zero history (together for first time), heterogeneous (different kinds of members) team that will stay together over the course of the semester. Students will be responsible for the initial acquisition of the course content (assigned readings) and for working collaboratively with other students during experiential applications of the content.
Strengths Model: Considerable research suggests that people experience far higher returns when they invest energy improving strength areas rather than working on weak areas. People also differ in their areas of strength, in this case, the academic assignments students must complete to earn course credit. While one student may struggle with writing and excel at reading comprehension and test taking, another may have the opposite experience. To allow students to work to their strengths, 150 points in the course come from a list of assignments from which students can choose. (See Cluster Assignments’ description below)
Attendance: Learning in this course takes two major forms--cognitive and experiential. The latter requires participation and observation in common classroom experiences. Although attendance is not required, students’ grades will indirectly reflect absences through peer evaluation. It will be impossible to fully participate in your team’s interactions if you are not in class. The first step in receiving full credit for participation is to come to all the classes. In addition, please be on time.
CLASS POLICIES:
Email: Students can email me through the WebCT course supplemental site or directly at plutgen@unm.edu. Students can email each other and/or the instructor through the WebCT system. Logon to https://vista.unm.edu/webct, click on “Communication Tools” icon, and then the “Email” icon. To reply or respond to course emails, you will have to do so in the WebCT course site. I will check course email at least once daily. Please email again or call me if you do not receive a response within three (3) working days of sending me an email message; there is always the possibility of problems with electronic messaging.
***
I will not send grades or otherwise private student information via email.
Papers will not be accepted via email without prior instructor approval.
Academic Integrity: You will be expected to maintain the highest standard of academic integrity. Violations include, but are not limited to, cheating, fabrication, tampering, plagiarism or facilitating such activities. These actions are grounds for immediate failure. The University reserves the right to take disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, against any student who is found guilty of academic dishonesty or otherwise fails to meet these standards. In this graduate course, you are expected to know APA style for citing outside sources. Plagiarism is one of the most serious ethical missteps a scholar can make, so it is imperative to give credit where credit is due. See for UNM academic honesty policy and statement at http://handbook.unm.edu/D100.html. Students who have questions concerning scholastic regulations and procedures at the University should refer to the "General Academic Regulations" section of the University Catalog.
Written Work Guidelines (except for in-class writing):
1. Word-processed work (12 font, left-hand justified, double-spaced, 1” margins, APA format if citations used)
2. Hand-written work (in-class assignments; neatly printed or written; black or blue ink or No.2 pencil)
3. Accurate written form (structure, punctuation, spelling, etc.)
4. Late assignments subject to Late Work policy below.
Late Work Grading Policy:
Grade Appeals:
Readiness Assessment Tests: If a team believes that their answer to a particular question on a Readiness Assessment Test (RAT) is as good as, or better than, the one designated as correct by your professor, the team may submit a written appeal. Use the forms provided in the team folder. All appeals must be in writing and come from teams. Individuals cannot make RAT question appeals. If the appeal is granted, points go only to the team that structured and submitted the appeal. Detailed instructions for the appeal process are included in the reading packet. When an appealed answer will benefit an individual team member, adjustments will be made accordingly. Granted team-appealed answers will never work to the detriment of individual test scores.
Assignment appeals: I will not discuss grades on the day an assignment is returned.
ADA Accessibility: Qualified students with disabilities needing appropriate academic adjustments should contact me as soon as possible to ensure your needs are met in a timely manner. Handouts are available in alternative accessible formats upon request.
Diversity: This course encourages different perspectives related to such factors as
gender, race, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, and other
relevant cultural identities. This course seeks to foster understanding and
inclusiveness related to such diverse perspectives and ways of communicating.
Ethics: The course emphasizes ethical practices and perspectives. Above all, students and instructors should strive to communicate and act, both in class interactions and in assigned coursework, in a manner directed by personal integrity, honesty, and respect for self and others. Included in this focus is the need for academic honesty by students as stated by the UNM Pathfinder. Students need to do original work and properly cite sources. For example, be aware of plagiarism—directly copying more than 3 or 4 words from another author without quoting (not just citing) the author is plagiarism. Further, course content will encourage the ethical practices and analysis of professional communication.
FOUR (4) COURSE CONTENT MACRO UNITS:
I. Unit One: Overview
a. Parry & Bryman (2006). Leadership in Organizations
b. Hay, I. (2007). Transactional and Transformational Leaderships Compared
c. Beebe & Masterson (2003). Leadership in Small Groups
a. Maher & Maher (2004). Emergent
Leadership: Toward an Empirically Verifiable Model
b. Hayes
(1984). Perceptions Of Leadership Emergence: A Comparative Study Of Men And
Women.
c. Pescosolido (2005). Managing Emotion: A New Role for Emergent Group Leaders
a. George (2000). Emotions and Leadership: The Role of Emotional Intelligence
b.
Ashkanasy & Tse (2000).
c.
Transformational Leadership as Management of Emotions:
A Conceptual Review.
d. Gardner & Stough (2001). Examining the Relationship between Leadership and Emotional Intelligence in Senior Level Managers.
Assignments And
Points
Assignment |
Points |
(4) Individual
Readiness Assessment Tests (25 points @) |
100 |
(4) Team Readiness
Assessment Test (25 points @) |
100 |
Team In-class
Activities (points will depend on actual # of activities) |
50-100 |
Emotional
Intelligence Survey |
20 |
Personal Code of
Ethics |
50 |
Cluster Assignment
1 |
50 |
Cluster Assignment
2 |
50 |
Cluster Assignment 3 |
50 |
Service Learning
Project (125) ; Project Fair (75) |
200 |
Peer Evaluation
(Measuring contribution to team; % of in-class team activities’ points each
member earns) |
|
Total |
up to 720 |
Assignments’ Overview: Details for assignments will be posted on the WebCT site. Aside from
in-class work, students will submit most assignments via the WebCT site. See
end of syllabus for detailed instructions on how to submit assignments to the
website.
1. Readiness Assessment Tests (RATs): The course material is partitioned into four macro-units. RATs are designed to test reading comprehension for material in required macro-unit readings. For each unit, students will complete an individual test and a group test. Team tests are “self-grading,” so students will immediately know their individual and team scores. Group scores will be posted for comparison across teams.
2. Team In-class Activities: Much of the course material application will occur in team-based experiential activities, some of which will be graded.
3.
Personal code of ethics. Each student will
formalize their ethical code of conduct. This code will cover core areas
regarding ethical professional communication and behavior.
4.
Emotional
Intelligence Test. Students
will complete an online EI survey, print out report, and turn in to instructor.
(Make a copy for yourself also.) I will compile names and emails at the
beginning of the semester. The EIT folks will send you an email with a link in
order to complete the EIT.
5.
Course Choice Cluster Assignments. Students will
choose any combination of two or three of the following assignments (150 total
points). Students will complete a contract at the beginning of the semester
committing to the cluster assignments they wish to complete over the course of
the semester. Each choice is briefly outlined below; point values follow each
assignment name. Detailed instructions are posted on WebCT.
a.
Attendance (50 points; 3.57 points per class—no
excused absences)
b.
Ethical case study analysis. (50 points) Students
can choose up to three (3) case analyses, if desired. These will usually be
drawn from the book, Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership or
another instructor-designated source.
c.
Peer-reviewed research article summaries. (50
points) The instructor will provide a list of articles on the four core units
we study over the semester. Students can choose up to three (3) article
summaries, if desired.
d.
Online emotional intelligence research exercise: (50 points) Visit http://www.eiconsortium.org/
and summarize a report provided on the website about emotional intelligence.
Students can choose one (1) online research exercise.
e.
Movie clip: (100 points) Screen a movie segment
that illustrates either ethical or unethical leadership communication. Show the
clip to the class in the unit to which the topic is most applicable and develop
a team-based learning activity to illustrate the point the clip makes about
leadership. See instructor about a list of potential movies. Student and
instructor will schedule class time for movie clip and activity.
f. Invite a professional. (50 points) Arrange for an outside speaker to present their ideas about leadership to the class. I am especially interested in ethics and leadership, but speakers can choose their own topic. Provide at least one handout regarding speaker and speaker’s content.
g. Learning-team experiential activity. (100 points) Design a competitive team activity that students can do in class. Activity should be scheduled in a learning unit where the lesson/topic fits best; talk to instructor about scheduling and do so early. Student and instructor will arrange for necessary resources (time, materials, etc.).
h.
Mid-term exam (50 points) 25
T/F & MC questions based on first half of the semester’s course readings)
i.
End-term Exam. (50 points)
25 T/F & MC questions based on second half of the semester’s course
readings)
j. Other: If you have another idea for a cluster assignment, speak with me.
6. Service Learning Project; Project Fair: Teams will design and carry out a leadership service learning project. The projects should address a community issue and have as its core a leadership lesson/application. At the end of the semester, teams will create Service Fair Project entries (like high school science fairs) that visually illustrate the leadership project and its focal issue.
7. Peer Evaluation. As a part of the final exam, each student will fill out a form evaluating each team member’s contribution to the team’s overall success. This assessment will be used mathematically to determine the proportion of the group’s points that each member receives. That is, the initial points for graded group work is the same for everyone in the group. A given student’s evaluation score then multiplies this number. (For example, if Team Success earns 100 points, and Team member Bob receives an average rating of 90% from his team, Bob earns 90% of the 100 points = 90 points.)
Make-up: All late work is subject to Late Work policy stated above. Other
details are noted here.
RATs: Students absent the day of RATs must take them prior to returning to class. In such cases, individual scores will count as both individual and team score. (It serves students well not to miss RAT days.)
Final Exam: There will be no make-up opportunity for the final exam.
Course Schedule
Class # |
Date |
|
TOPIC |
|
ASSIGNMENTS DUE |
1 |
8/28 |
|
Course introduction, overview; team
formation, course structure |
|
|
2 |
9/4 |
|
Leadership basics Sample RAT test and appeal |
|
|
3 |
9/11 |
|
RAT 1 (Unit One Readings) |
|
RAT 1 |
4 |
9/18 |
|
In-class applications |
|
Cluster
#1 Due |
5 |
9/25 |
|
In-class applications |
|
|
6 |
10/2 |
|
RAT 2 (Unit Two Readings) In-class applications |
|
RAT 2 10/3/08
last day to withdraw w/o grade |
7 |
10/9 |
|
In-class applications |
|
Code of
Ethics Due |
|
10/16 |
|
Fall Break, No Class |
|
|
8 |
10/23 |
|
In-class applications |
|
Mid-term
exam |
9 |
10/30 |
|
RAT 3 (Unit Three Readings) In-class applications |
|
RAT 3 |
10 |
11/6 |
|
In-class applications |
|
Cluster
#2 Due |
11 |
11/13 |
|
In-class applications |
|
EI Test
Due |
12 |
11/20 |
|
RAT 4 (Unit 4 Readings) |
|
RAT 4 |
|
11/27 |
|
Thanksgiving, No Class |
|
|
13 |
12/4 |
|
In-class applications |
|
Cluster #
3 Due |
14 |
12/11 |
|
In-class applications |
|
|
15 |
12/18 |
|
End-term exam; 5:30 – 7:30, regular
classroom |
|
End-term
exam |
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
WEBCT COURSE SITE
I. Save all word-processed work into a rich text file (or submit in Word). I cannot download or open other word-processed formats.
II. Save assignments with your last name and a brief assignment title: i.e., “Smith Quantitative Research Proposal”
III. Then follow these instructions:
i. For example, if you’re submitting “Problem Solving,” place cursor on Problem-Solving, underline will appear, single mouse click to choose
ii. Click “Add Attachments” button
iii. A new window opens with a “My computer” icon on the left-hand side
iv. Click “my computer”
v. Go to where you saved your assignment on your computer (A drive, C drive, etc.)
vi. Double-click your assignment file (in Word or rtf)
vii. The file will then appear above the “Add Attachments” button
viii. Click “Submit”
ix. You will be asked if this is “okay”
x. Click “Okay”
xi. The site should display your assignment as a link.
xii. You’re finished.
xiii. There are separate assignment submission links for all assignments due in the class.