A research trial was conducted at the Langdon Research Extension Center with an objective to evaluate the performance of pesticide compounds to manage bacterial blight (BB) on field pea. The trial was planted on May 17, 2023 with the field pea variety ‘Salamanca’ in a randomized complete block design replicated four times. The trial followed state recommended practices for land preparation, fertilization, seeding rate, and weed control. The plot size was 5 ft. wide x 16 ft. long with a field pea border on either side of each plot. Pesticide compounds were applied at the Vn stage (nth true leaf unfolded at nth node with tendril present) using a CO2-pressurized backpack style sprayer with a three-nozzle boom (XR-8002) at 20 GPA. Prevailing weather conditions were dry during the crop growth period so the second spray at R-stage was not applied. The amount of BB infection obtained in the research plots was based on natural infections. A rating scale of 0 - 9 was adopted from Chaudhary 1996, where the severity of BB in a plot was recorded as the percentage of tissue area infected out of total leaf area examined. Fifty leaves from each plot were sampled and measured for the average percentage of lesion area. The rating scale was 0 = 0, 1 = 1-10 %, 3 = 11-30 %, 5 = 31-50 %, 7 = 51-75 %, and 9 = 76-100 %.
A disease index (DI) was calculated based on severity ratings using a formula:
DI= n (1) + n (3) + n (5) + n (7) + n (9)
tn
Where: n (1), n (3), n (5), n (7) and n (9) = number of leaves showing severity score of 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9. tn = total number of leaves scored.
Results: Significant differences were observed in bacterial blight control when sprayed with pesticide compounds compared to the non-treated check. There were no differences among the pesticide compounds evaluated. The bacterial blight incidence on various treatments on the field peas ranged from 27 to 60%, with a mean disease incidence of 32%. The severity of bacterial blight infections ranged from 5 to 34%, with a mean severity of 9%. The highest incidence and severity of bacterial blight was recorded in the non-treated check (Table 1). There were no significant differences found in the yield (at 13.5% moisture) and test weight (Table 1) among the pesticide compounds tested and the non-treated check (P-value non-significant).
Table 1: Efficacy of pesticide compounds in managing bacterial blight of field pea and their influence on yield and test weight.
| | Field Pea Bacterial Blight | Yield | Test wt. |
---|
Treatments | Rate | % Incidence | % Severity | (lbs/a) | lbs/bu |
Kocide (Copper Hydroxide) | 3-6 lbs/a | 31 | 6 | 2280 | 66 |
Copper Sulfate | 3-6 lbs/a | 27 | 7 | 3060 | 67 |
Guarda 30/30 | 3.3 lts/A | 34 | 7 | 2640 | 66 |
Zinc Oxide 400 mg | 400mg | 30 | 7 | 2520 | 66 |
Zinx Oxide 800 mg | 800mg | 34 | 6 | 2400 | 66 |
Surround WP | ½ lb/gallon of water | 25 | 6 | 2820 | 66 |
Resozurin Sodium Salt | 10 mg/a | 31 | 7 | 2160 | 66 |
Kanamycin | 50 µg/ml | 27 | 5 | 2400 | 66 |
Streptomycin sulfate | 3-6 lbs/a | 28 | 6 | 2400 | 66 |
Oxidate | 1% V/V | 27 | 6 | 2580 | 66 |
Non-Treated Check | Check | 60 | 34 | 2580 | 66 |
Mean | | 32 | 9 | 2520 | 66 |
CV% | | 23 | 43 | 20 | 1.4 |
LSD | | 11 | 6 | NS | NS |
P-Value (0.05) | | 0.00001* | 0.00001* | NS | NS |
Acknowledgements: Funding from the North Dakota Crop Protection Product Harmonization and Registration Board. Special thanks to Jacob Kram (NDSU), Brock Freer, and Kartheek Chapara.