Title

Fungicide Evaluation to Manage White Mold in Canola- 2017

(Research Report, Langdon REC, December 2017)
Lead Author
Lead Author:
Venkataramana Chapara, PhD
Other Authors

Amanda Arens

Availability
Availability:
Web only
Publication Sections

The research trial was conducted at the Langdon Research Extension Center and was planted on May 19th 2017 with the canola variety “DKL 30-42 (Roundup Ready)” in a randomized complete block design and replicated four times. Canola production recommendations for northeast North Dakota from the North Dakota State University Extension Service were followed. The plot size was 5 ft. x 16 ft.  long with a canola border between each plot. The trial was irrigated with an overhead sprinkler system set for 1 hour every day beginning one week before the start of bloom to 4 weeks after bloom to help increase disease infection levels. Fungicides were applied at 20% bloom using a CO2-pressurized backpack style sprayer with a three nozzle boom (XR-8002) at 20 GPA and were repeated 8 days after first spray. The amount of white mold infection obtained in the research plots was natural. Fifty plants per plot were rated on a scale of 0-5 (where 1=superficial lesions or small branch infected; 2=large branch(es) dead; 3=main stem at least 50% girdled; 4=main stem girdled but plant produced good seed; 5=main stem girdled, much reduced yield). The levels of incidence and severity were recorded for each plant prior to swathing (August 18). A white mold disease severity index was calculated with weighted scale of incidence and severity ratings. 

 

Table 1: Efficacy of commercially available fungicides in managing white mold and their influence on yield and test weight.

Treatments

Dosage

White Mold

Yield

Test Weight

 

(Fl oz/A)

DSI*

(lbs/A)

(lbs/bu)

Aproach + NIS

9

0.03

3794

52

Endura + NIS

6

1.33

4086

52

Proline + NIS

4.3

0.28

4200

52

Quash + NIS

3

0.19

3968

52

Topsin 

231(g/A)

0.23

4372

52

CHECK

Check

1.46

3769

52

Mean

 

0.59

4031

52

CV (%)

 

59

14

0.76

LSD

 

0.62

1014

0.7

p-Value

 

0.0006

NS

NS

NIS: Non-Ionic Surfactant 0.25% V/V

  

DSI*: White Mold Disease Severity Index

 

NS: Non-Significant

   

The results indicate there were significant differences obtained among the fungicides tested and the non-treated check. More white mold DSI was observed in Endura and the non-treated check while Aproach was low. There were no significant differences among the treatments when yield and test weights were compared.

 

Acknowledgements: Bryan Hanson, Travis Hakanson and Lawrence Henry for their technical support.